what is it? Timmy has fallen into a well? take us to him, boy

 

Hello.  Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers).  This blog is about presenting and discussing, discovering and applying the principles that comprise this little “theory” of personality.  Based only, totally and entirely on anecdotal evidence and (constant) observation, the Wakefield Doctrine is proving itself to be a unique and fun and (actually) quite effective way to view the behavior of the other people in our lives.  With the perspective provided by the Doctrine, why the people act the way that they do finally begins to make sense.  What a relief!  It isn’t that you were not capable of understanding them, it was never your lack of intelligence in being able to apply “proven” theories of personality and most of all, it has not been your fault for how your loved ones have acted towards to you.

You just needed the perspective of the Wakefield Doctrine.  You just needed to know that personality is not hard-wired into people, causing them to act certain ways.  You just needed to see that everyone experiences the world in one of three, slightly different ways.  You only needed to be able to understand and see the world from the bias/premise/reality of the other person and how they acted made perfect sense.

With the Wakefield Doctrine you can: recognise the three types of people; by recognising them you can appreciate the world that they are experiencing and not be caught off-guard or otherwise be surprised by their behavior.

Hey, it’s got it all.

But first we should address one of our DownSprings concerns that appears in the Comment to the last Post.
glenn writes: A)  Who the fuck is Speedy West? (Should I apologize for “crudeness”?) and he goes on to write:
                           B)   Studley still in the house. Cheerio Stud fella. Please verify this for me–you being British and all. The origin of the word soccer….The word is derived from the British penchant for shortening longer words and re-arranging them. There used to be a Football Association–or something like that–in Merry Olde. The brits took the 2nd syllable of the word association and stretched it to form the word soccer. You Brits are always fucking around like that. One of the things I like about you Limey bastards. So, tell me Studley…Is it true? Talk to me Studley. The doctrine cries out for international input. Say something here. Are you guys still mad about The War of 1812?

As primary author and moderator of this here blog here (and with thanks to the author of the Screenplay of Pulp Fiction), “Allow me to retort”

glenn is a scott, hence the penchant for “shocking” language.  If I had the time, we could go on for pages about why that is and what he gets from saying ‘fuck’ a lot, but I want to save that for a time when I am even more bereft of ideas than I am at this moment*.  The shortest explanation is provided by the tee shirt that will soon be available here at the Doctrine Fashion Center, it will say: “scott!!!: I scream, therefore I am“. (Damn, how totally true is this Doctrine !) That should clear up Point A, now for Point 2
glenn appears to be trying to draw out and engage one of the Readers of the Doctrine. (As can be seen on the home page, there is a ‘widget’ that indicates the geographical location of visitors to the Doctrine). Studley, United Kingdom is a regular Reader of the Wakefield Doctrine, we know that much but nothing else.  As a scott, glenn is offering the appearance of knowing about the background of Studley, UK as part of his effort to draw them into a conversation.  He (glenn) has done a little  research into the etymology of the word soccer in the hopes of convincing ’Studley’ that his intentions are totally benign, but he is, of course, a scott.  Benign is not the correct word.  It is not that scotts are in any ways negative, bad, whatever, it is simply that they are acquisitory.

(We interrupt this exposition to bring you the mandatory Lesson in the Wakefield Doctrine found in every Post.  We’ll make it short).  scotts: live in a reality of predator/prey.  They are always and constantly testing their environments for threats and for a food supply.  In social terms, they are very gregarious and they are very aggressive, they will approach everyone they encounter with the sole/initial purpose of establishing dominance/submission.  At a party, the scottian male is the center of attention and will have an endless supply of jokes to tell (each joke told to a group is increasingly offensive, the better to maintain dominance).  The scottian female, is also very aggressive, consistent with cultural norms, (sort of).  She will be followed by, surrounded by rogers. rogers loves they scottian females and will do anything for them.

(OK, done.  Back to our little glenn).  So glenn is trying to draw out Studly, UK but to no avail.  We have nothing back from them and that is just fine with the author.  The rate of Comments from a given number of Readers is very low across the board.  We have patience.
Anyway, have you ever played with a puppy?  You make the hand-gestures, like a small animal approaching and retreating.  The dog loves that!  They will advance and retreat themselves playing a hunting game (in this case with your hand), however if you make too sudden a motion, they will begin to bark, no longer so sure that this is a game with a lesser animal.  Back and forth, predator and prey.  If you do not get the point by now, then maybe the Crocheting with Emily blog would be a bit more appropriate.

So.  That should serve for today’s Post.
I want to thank Studley, United Kingdom and DownSpring glenn for providing us with a topic, a subject, a premise, whatever the hell you call it when you write about something as a starting point to go into another subject.

Oh yeah, Speedy West.  (You know I get kind of pissed off at times…well a lot of times….now that I think of it…all the time when I read something that forces me to see the shortcomings of my own type.  And, given my own type, what forces me to see is not what I am, but what others are not.  My type always looks to others for the good things and as an example of what we are not, but the thing about glenn…a scott and scotts are fairly intelligent…and has an interest in music and does not know who Speedy West is…and he should, but (here is where my type gets mad at our selves) he doesn’t and apparently sees no need to find out what he doesn’t know…he is quite comfortable not knowing…because he is a scott…and my type is not.  So since this Doctrine is also about learning to be “better” people, I must learn from this and set an example to all Readers…so I do take the lesson from glenn and so my penultimate response to his Comment is:

Fuck you…

YouTube Preview Image

And since I enjoyed that so much here’s another one (without the live video)

YouTube Preview Image



 

Share

and now a word from our

 …have I mentioned that we will have Wakefield Doctrine t-shirts available this summer?

…yeah, we will probably start by giving them away in contests, (no chance of running out of stock taking that approach, lol… ) 
(…can I say something?…it’s getting real uncomfortable in here… )

…yeah, we figure if the hats (for your damn head) take off, the next logical item would be that old standby, ‘life-philosophy-short-enough-to-wear’ clothing item…  tee-shirts!…you know, maybe a contest to come up with things to print on Wakefield Doctrine t-shirts is not a bad idea…

…alright, a contest it is!…and then we have to get to a discussion of the points raised by our own resident roger (in the last Post)…
(…can’t you ever just relax and have some fun?…always with the Doctrine says this and the Doctrine proves that…if I were not ‘imaginary‘…)

Send in your suggestions for things to print on the Wakefield Doctrine t-shirts, the only requirement is that they must be Doctrine related, when we get a bunch, we will put them all in a Post and call for a vote!
So far we have: (from Glenn):

Really, Dude. Try not to be such a (roger, scott, clark)
I’m a scott—I Scream, Therefore I Am
I’m a roger—and you should try to be a better person
I’m a clark—You can TRY to follow my train of thought…

…my own suggestion:  I ♥ Janie Sullivan
(…how sweet, you are not so bad for a reality-based figure in a blog…wait ’til I tell Britney and Jimmy…they will be so ‘I wish I was you’… )

…since we always have to further the understanding of the Doctrine, let’s have a brief discussion of some of the points made in the last Post (CSR 101).
[ED Note: Glenn was late submitting his part of the Discussion below...there must have been some sudden movement, a bright shiny object or pershaps something soft and furry...(picture Glenn-shaped cloud at a computer slowly dissapating)...anyway his responses may be slightly out of sync but are still germane...scotts...what can ya do?]

(ROGER):   “…I’ll be referring to the last post’s mention of an affinity that exists between clarks and scotts…”
 (not ROGER):   …of course there is an affinity!  We all share the same potential! to quote the About Page:
Born with the potential to view the world in one of these three ways, all people possess the characteristics of all (three) but soon (by age 7 or so) ‘become one of the three.  Put another way: we all possess the potential to see the world as a clark or a scott or a roger.  It is only the predominance of qualities from one (over the other two) that makes us what we are.  No one is only clarklike or scottian or rogerian.
(GLENN):   Affinity is the wrong word. There are points of agreement– some compatible beliefs and perceptions–not affinity. And it is not so sinister as you have concluded. There are lots of times when clarks piss off scotts–and vice versa. Totally random. No shared agenda to put anyone down. But once a roger starts to believe something like this–it takes on life of its own. Panic sets in. Ever hear the term “Spooking the Horses”?

(ROGER):   “…I suppose that this affinity is pretty common discourse to clarks and scotts ( I have been calling it a symbiosis), but let me assure all of you; to rogers, it is quite occult.  We simply don’t see it.  Not to say we wouldn’t understand it, if illustrated.  We just don’t have a nature that would necessarily notice it.  I strongly suppose that this symbiosis is very much a second nature to clarks and scotts…”
(not ROGER):   There! there! that is a rogerian expression…he said occult…he knew the correct word but he went for the nearly correct word…damn how do they do that! Unfortunately for the herded ones, ‘symbiosis’ is not the correct term to use.  There is more commonality between clarks and rogers than there is between clarks and scotts. (This)  affinity is simply the result of the fact that clarks are not the prey of scotts, as are rogers.
(GLENN):   Hate to say this, but it is not a mystery. Rogers are simply not comfortable with anything that appears to leave them out. Without the herd, what is a roger? So, any agreement between two beings, that leaves a roger out–is suspect, possibly dangerous. Like any prey animal, they get irrationally fearful–their nostrils flare–they panic and act up–simply because they are not IN CONTROL.

(ROGER):   “…The affinity/ symbiosis is based on a shared disdain for rogers.  It is the common groundwork for all of their perceptions of rogers, and serves as the springboard to all their interactions with us.  They each have a…personal mythology that… define them as a clark or a scott…  you have your own too, and it leans you towards being more a roger than not…theirs tells them that they are vastly superior to rogers…they have it completely in common.  We… be the shared object of derision…”
(not ROGER):   fingers of one hand rubbing together…that’s the sound of me playing the world’s smallest violin…if there were not imaginary high school students in this blog right now, I might begin to get annoyed…disdain?… How about we define the term Projection: (In Psychoanalytic Theory…) the defense mechanism whereby we transfer or project our feelings about ourselves or one person onto another person.(DSM IV)
(GLENN):   Think of me as The Roger Whisperer. There..there..easy, boy. It’s just the normal way people link up and divide. It’s not clarks and scotts against the rogers. You only THINK you see a pattern. Its really more random..and natural–no danger..I’ll help you… His fight/flight response is off the charts. Poor thing. Here’s a sugar cube, boy..calm down..

(ROGER):   “…Well, #%*# that.  It’ not real.  While we’re busy singing ” We Are The World” and trying to figure out how to feed the planet, they’ve already got it solved.  If they kill you,then they eat well for a few days, and screw the planet.  Actually, to be specific; the clarks also have to eat, but don’t have the stomach for the kill.  So they find a way to get the scotts to do it for them. Symbiosis…”
(not ROGER):   Is that meant as an insult? rogers seem to have a certain…what is the word?…yes? Miss Sullivan?  (Disdain- D I S D A I N- Disdain) Thank you!  that is the correct answer and can you venture a guess why it is that rogers have such regard for clarks( gee, I knew this one kid and she was like all different from everyone and the like cheerleaders would really make fun and stuff at lunch in the cafeteria…they thought that she was like stuck-up and weird and everything but if you got to know her you knew that she wasn’t really and I finally had to say something and then they tried to make fun of me…and you can imagine how well that worked for them lol…they stopped making fun pretty soon after I had a little private talk with the head cheerleader..lol can you say shallow?)
Thank you Miss Sullivan, I suspect that this topic is much more involved than anyone imagined…what? yes, it is good to discuss these things, the Doctrine does in fact maintain that we all start the same and even though we might experience the world differently, there is still the capability in each of us to identify with either of the other two…no, I do not think it would be appropriate to hold hands and sing…back to class! everyone! much, much more to learn and so very little time left!…

YouTube Preview Image

..what’s that, Janie? your grandmother liked that song?…lol and your point Miss Sullivan? well, I supposed we could get a little more contemporary.  No, I really don’t believe we gain or lose readership as a result of the videos…

YouTube Preview Image

…what do you mean still too old?

Share

© 2009-2012 the Wakefield Doctrine All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright