the 3 Personality Types + Wakefield Doctrine + Friday

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers )

Today is Friday. (as regular contributers to Wikipedia, lets start over there)

The name Friday comes from the Old English Frīġedæġ,meaning the “day of Frige”. The same holds for Frīatag in Old High German, Freitag in Modern German and Vrijdag in Dutch

OK, before the scotts can get too worked up,  ( …”hell yeah they was talking about fridge day, whereby dem Norseans had to be talking about brewskies! in the fridge… YEAH !!! ” ) Lets delve a little deeper into the etymology.

The word for Friday in most Romance languages is derived from Latin dies Veneris, “day of Venus” (a translation of Greek Aphrodites hemera) such as vendredi in French, venerdì in Italian, viernes in Spanish, divendres in Catalan, vennari in Corsican, and vineri in Romanian. This is also reflected in the p-Celtic Welsh language as dydd Gwener. An exception is Portuguese, also a Romance language, which uses the word sexta-feira,meaning “sixth day of liturgical celebration”, derived from the Latin “feria sexta” used in religious texts where it was not allowed to consecrate days to pagan gods

I can hear the lowing of rogers with their cropped and tagged ears perking up at the mention of old dead people in love,  ( …but you don’t understand! It’s a beautiful story of long ago with a beautiful woman promising the brave champion a place among the gods, except the other woman who always hangs around won’t let him go on his Quest, even though they both will be better off if she would only not be so constricting, why can’t she just let him have some fun sometimes. Like on Friday night… )   ( …yeeahh!! brewskies!!!… ).  Clearly, Friday has always been a special spot on the calendar of the days of the week.

Traditionally, Roman Catholics were obliged to refrain from eating the meat of land animals on Fridays, although fish was allowed. However, episcopal conferences are now authorized to allow some other form of penance to replace abstinence from meat. Many still choose the traditional form of Friday penance ( ..hey scott! Come back!! He said abstinence from meat…lol )

So that accounts for why we call today, Friday.  Everything has got to have a name, and the etymolgy of the word can be very enlightening, what with the insight it affords us… ( …excuse me, how come the clark speaking in today’s Post is not placed in italics like scott and I and does not have a characteristic color to the font? What happened, did they run out of beige font?  ….Fuck YEAH!!! FONT!! )

Lets look a little closer at the manifestation of Friday, particularly in most Western cultures.  Maybe it’s best to bullet point all of the sayings and references to Friday and see where that takes us  ( …how inspired… )

  • TGIF (aka Thank God It’s Friday) a popular restaurant chain and graphic example of the cultural larceny of the corporatocracy, wtf! this has been a commonly used expression since Davy frickin Crockett! People have been celebrating the end of the work week, and throwing in some religious reminders of how the Lord is our savior and would it hurt so terribly much to thank Him, it’s not like he wants to tag along as we go out to the bar right after work…but we wouldn’t say no if He did ask….to come along….to the bar   ( …hey Jesus, you be my wingman, watch the master…  “Excuse me Miss Do you have a map? I just keep getting lost in your eyes” … stop laughing scott…get down off the chair and lets see you do better.)
  • Black Friday: ”as a term has been used in multiple contexts, going back to the nineteenth century, where it was associated with a financial crisis in 1869 in the United States. The earliest known reference to “Black Friday” to refer to the day after Thanksgiving was made in a 1966 publication” (Wikipedia ) 
  • Friday Night Arrives Without a Suitcase, the “Friday line” in Lady Madonna by the Beatles. Nothing funny or clever about that, cept it was the Beatles.

Just so no one can accuse me of pasting videos and Wikipedia and calling it a Doctrine Post, here is the lesson from today’s Post as presented by the ‘other two’:

… well you certainly gave it a good effort and everyone feels that you have been under a lot of strain, so why don’t you just stop trying so hard and everything will magically, possibly miraculously allow the spotlight to shift to another spot for a while, can I recommend the Secessionist Rag…everyone will think so much more of your little blog here once they have had a…little rest?

FCUK  yeah!! brewskies!! so what if I spelled it wrong its in caps!!! YEAH….!!..

YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image

Share

no, no, no…I said Kill the cattle and

…”some people call me Maurice…cause I speak of the pompitous of love…”

Hi!  Good Morning to you all, I am so happy to be here.  It is sort of the end of the week, so I will try to be brief ( …lol… ) there is a whole Sunday waiting for all of us out there except, of course,  our friends in the Marshall Islands.  Hey, Marshallians! dudes, ya gotta get to work!  It’s not our fault you guys is on the wrong side of the dateline ( …no Britney, not for that reason… ).  Don’t forget the lead underwear*

So, Sunday and almost all the proms are over and we know what that means…summer vacation time!

I can see that this is shaping up to be a  placeholder Post, so let’s get right to the Wakefield Doctrine Lesson of the Day… now Readers, if you will turn to the Chapter on…….( …no! it’s Sunday (SUNDAAY!!!!SUNDAYYY!!… ) (…Can’t we please skip the lesson today?… )
Well, Miss Sullivan if you can get your little friend Britney and whats his name…Jimmy to sit down for a minute, I think we might be able to accommodate them.

Alright. You all have the day off, (especially you clarks). No Doctrine, no reflection,  no analyzin’ or dramatzin’… just take the damn day off.  (…I mean it, clarks!)  Just go out to the day and live**.  If you are still alive tomorrow, come back and tell us about your Sunday. 
There, that should make you clarks feel better, an assignment.  For tomorrow’s Post I expect a full report.

So, class. This being the end of the year and even though you are not graduating until next year…here is some music so you don’t feel left out.

YouTube Preview Image

Disoriented enough?  No?  Well before you go running out to the schoolyard…

Some more appropriate music…(keep listening, you just have never heard the whole thing…scott)

YouTube Preview Image

* serious explodage…you know…nah…you don’t want to know and we don’t care…

**live, i.e. Life, the thing that passes by as clarks get ready for the best of all lives; the thing that continually lets down and disappoints rogers, mostly in the quality of people sent to assist them in having the best of all…lives; scotts… they do gots the living life thang down…Socrates notwithstanding and assuming that eating, defecating, pro-creating and sleeping comprise the embodiment of a well lived life, scotts are ok on this score. (…on that score they have much in common with the highest form of life on the planet, dogs. Except not as subtle.)

Hey! Moe RRReece!

YouTube Preview Image
Share

I’ve got news for you, thats not my thumb

What do you mean, ‘It’s Readers Day’, and why do I have to come up with a new Post?  It’s 7:45 am and I have to get out and get to work…sure I know the pattern of Reader Visits, afterall I am the damn creator…so what if there is no new content on Reader’s Day…(and stop calling it that!) .  It is simply a part of the pattern…people realize that there is not going to be a new Post each and every day so they check in once or twice a week.  Maybe they even wait to let new content build up, that’s what roger said he does about the Spatula

So, you still have not explained why we need a totally new Post right now when there is zero Visits.  I think the Readers will show up and read what is Posted, the (current Post) “…and now a word from…” is a perfectly good Post, it’s got information…they have not seen it yet…it even has Comments, but has not ‘taken off’…(‘as if the Readers will actually make a Comment’, thank you Miss Sullivan that will be enough…).

Let’s compromise…let’s plug this in the front…alright and one video and run with the most recent Post…after all, new content is new content.

HEY! Readers!  No, the guy walking behind you as you sit in front of a computer with a url of wakefielddoctrine.com…of course I mean you…jeesus…I thought our demographic was a little more evolved that…don’t you dare hit that next page/last page!
What is your problem…write a damn Comment….no contest…no totally cute appeal from a imaginary high school junior attending Millard Fillmore High School…‘the fighting adolescents’…no tricky word play…just tell me what is the deal…you are reading this…how?  I am the fuckin creator of this thing…as in dashboard…as in you see that Visitor thing to the right…of course I know what days people show up…and who the hell is that keeps trying to write a Comment but is coming in from a pricebuster.com or some damn site…SPAM…the filters are calling you spam…we know the demo of our readers place you  in the upper percentiles of intelligence…let’s see some of that demonstrated…what? video?  screw that…23 visits by noon and maybe then you will see come cleverly selected music…alright as an alternate, show me one Comment from someone I don’t already know and we’ll see…

So scroll down and read the Post and write a damn Comment…don’t make me have to write in some other font color again…you wouldn’t like me in any other damn font color…
(if the Sloviansss had Popeye cartoons in the day then at this point, if you listened carefully he would be muttering…
zakaj fuck moram jaz sitnost s to.  rabim doseleti se niz ter izdelovanje a spodoben življenje. vijak oliven Oyl ter zraven kaj za vraga milosten ugleden je to?  oliven Oyl. pustiti Bluto življati svoj. oni zaslužiti drug drugega. to po škotsko , pretiravanje sin od a zoprn.”)

What is that?  Miss Sullivan…a Wakefield Doctrine lesson?, sure make it quick…

“umm as you can see things are a little testy around here this morning (alright Jimmy enough of that) but I am in existence to allow for a quick change in narrative direction, so here goes…he really is kind of upset…mostly about the layout of the blog and the fact that he was out searching for other blogs for ideas and came across a bunch of blogs with ‘hit counts’ in the millions!  about pop music…not original content…no content at all to speak of..just millions of hits…he says he does not care but you know how reality-based constructs can be about that sort thing, they are all… “but I am real and this is a real thing that I do and those visitors are real people, why can’t they”…and I am all “whatever, I think you write the best blog in the world”…and then he quiets down.
But we promised that there would always be a lesson to each Post, so here goes today’s:

Not only are rogers the keepers of culture and history and maintenance of the ‘status quo’, they are the story tellers…in the past they would have been the minstrels, the keepers of the verbal history of us all…this is clearly seen in the Posts of the roger…totally limited in number, so much so that there is no real continuity of storyline, yet people enjoy reading his Posts, his stories…and it is in his ‘voice’…because it is the voice of the many, of the herd.  And the ‘proof ‘ of the Wakefield Doctrine lies in the fact that both clarks and scotts respond to this ‘voice’ and that is because we have our rogerian aspects within.  I am  a clark, but a part of me longs for the herd…

…there!  now can I go? I really must get to the bus stop, I promised Britney I would pick her up there before she had to ride to school with those ‘vo ed’ kids…’ta

YouTube Preview Image

 

YouTube Preview Image

 

 

 

 

 

Share

that ought to hold the little bastards

Back by Self-Induced Demand! 

We did our first ’Advice Column with Ms AKH’  back in January, it was an offshoot  of a Post  (that she wrote about couples).  Like nearly every other Post, it served as a way to present  the Wakefield Doctrine in an everyday context.  Following is the second in this series of Advice Columns,  which we have decided to title: ‘as if I care‘. 
As an added bonus,  we have asked some of our other Progenitors and Downsprings to participate. The advantage (of this) will be to offer the view point of other types (i.e. a clark and a roger).

   

Question:
Dear Ms. AKH,
I am a sophomore at Fillmore High School, get pretty good grades and am on the track team (high hurdles). There is a girl in my history class who was very nice, very pretty and she even laughed at my jokes. Anyway, I finally worked up my nerve to ask her out. I thought a football game would be the best safe first date. So I asked her on (a) Tuesday and she said yes! I was totally surprised. Anyway I told everyone and even my parents (who I needed to borrow the car from). Everything was perfect but then on Friday before the game Nancy (the girl I asked out) told me that her aunt was sick and that she could not make our date. :( I was very disappointed. But she said next game…Trouble was I did not what to tell my parents (not every day I get to borrow the car). So I went to the game anyway.  On the way from the parking lot, guess who I see? It was Nancy! (With some guy from the wrestling team). Here is my question: She came up to me and said hi and I got nervous that she would remember that she told me she couldn’t make it to the game. I was afraid she would be embarrassed. So I said ‘hi’ and made a couple of jokes and got out of there! Does that make me weird? Does the Wakefield Doctrine have anything to help? 
(PS. After the game I went to the McDonalds where everyone goes and bought 2 meals and sat in my car…I kinda laughed at that).  I really should ask: should I be:  a)worried;  b)scared or  c)planning on going to a monastery
signed
: whats wrong with me?

Answer:
JOANNE:  
 That sounds like something I would do, or feel.  Why should I care how she feels, I’m the one who should be feeling bad, but that’s a roger for you.  It doesn’t make you weird, just a probable roger.

DOWNSPRING#1:    You need to be all three, Mr. ”what’s wrong with me” – worried, scared and plan on going into a monastery
You are a young and as yet unaware clark and as such, not only do you have the typical life as a teen issues, you also have the fear typically carried around by clarks.  Here is your new homework assignment:  go to the Wakefield Doctrine and read each page on the 3 forms, clark, scott and roger.  Study, study.  Then read all the other stuff.  Conduct your own “test” and try and identify the object of your desire and her new boyfriend.  If you can start knowing how they “view the world”, how they act in it won’t be such a mystery.  If you had had all this information on that Friday before the game, you would not have been so shocked by seeing Nancy and her wrestling guy.
Now to my actual advice:  get over yourself and your self consciousness.  One day you will learn(hopefully soon) that clarks have an affinity with scotts.  What does this mean? It means that if you grow a set and stop the self indulgence you can confidently “get the girl”.  Ask yourself next time, “what would a scott do?”.

  

Question:
Dear Ms. AKH. My Husband says he wants a divorce!  He is a good man with a steady job (an engineer), this comes as a total shock.  He has always been quiet, works hard and his only hobby is one of those model airplane clubs.  He goes every Saturday and stands around and flies these scale model airplanes.  But that is all he does.  He is not telling me why he wants this, just says that he ‘needs more from life’.  I read the Wakefield Doctrine blog and I think he is a roger.  But I don’t care about that, I just want my family back (we have a dog but no children, he never wanted children). Help!
signed:  Quietly waiting at home.
 

Answer:
MS. AKH: Your husband definitely sounds like a roger.  Especially being an engineer.  (Did you know that (rogers) are the engineers and accountants of the world?  Their perception of the world is one in which everything is ‘quantifiable’,  as if, lol)  They also exhibit “herd-like” tendencies.  That is to say, they do not venture away from others unlike themselves.  Not sure what to make of your spouse’s desire for a divorce.  Perhaps he is a restless roger (unusual but not unheard of) and his seemingly mundane flying of the airplanes is, in fact, not so mundane in his mind.  It may be symbolic of his desire to travel to exotic places.  Break away from the herd as it were.  Rather than being “quiet at home” you should try to ’spice things up’.  Try asking him about where he thinks of going to when he’s flying his planes. Is he flying in circles or is he going somewhere. Hey if he answers the second, surprise him with tickets for a trip  somewhere.  It may just satisfy his desire for needing more from life.  Change the routine of everyday life.  Become more spontaneous.  Shake things up.  I hope this is helpful and remember, don’t sit quietly at home.  Get up off of the couch.  Buy something that will really attract his attention (if you know what I mean).  Put yourself out there girlfriend and re-ignite the flame!  

JOANNE: I’m pretty sure that I would have known something was wrong and would not have been shocked.  I probably would have already started asking him what’s going on.  I would ask him why he wants a divorce and I would probably feel devastated.

  

Question
OK, Ms. “like I care”, tell me how to handle this one.  I started a new job about a month ago.  I am a cashier in a retail environment.  No responsibility other than “checking ” people out.  Here’s the thing.  My previous work history involved some management experience and I can’t help but notice that there are several fellow employees in need of some “guidance” as to their professional comportment.  Do I talk to my immediate managers about the fact that there needs to be some training or rather re-training of some people?  Or, do I try and impart some wisdom to these people myself?  Do I go right to the top and talk to the Store Director?  It bugs the crap out of me to watch anyone embarrass themselves professionally when often all they really need are some “helpful” tips. 
Signed: tight lipped in Telluride.
 

Answer:
Downspring#1:
   Well, the answer depends. What do you want? Are you concerned with these employees or are you concerned with the store (how it looks to the public). Look at it from the perspective of a roger and a scott, (we will assume, from the tone of your letter that you are a clark).
A roger would do the following: ‘friend-up’ to the employees in question, get to know them, and eventually let them know that he (the roger) has their back.  He would then go to the management and tell then that the employees are letting the company down and kindly offer to help train the people.  As a deal closer he might then get specific as to what some of the employees think of the management.
A scott would go up to the employee (if the scott decided that it mattered) and tell the employee that they need to change their behavior.  Depending on the gender of either the scott or the roger, this advice might be followed by the suggestion: ‘you look like you need a hug’.

JOANNE:  I would first ask them if they want some helpful tips..if they say yes, i would give them.  If they say no, then I would say they don’t care about being embarrassed professionally.  Oops,  I think that’s the scott talking.

There you have it, Issue 2 of ‘..as if I care…’ If you have any questions or Comments, then click on the Title (of this Post) and look at the bottom where it says your Reply here. (Guess what you do next…)

No music… 

…well alright, but  a song that I like…

YouTube Preview Image

Hey, we love when you leave a Comment. But if you don’t see your (Comment) show right up after you write it, it might be getting caught as spam. Luckily I have so much time on my hands I read the spam…so if one of your Comments read as following, try again see you name in lights…win a hat (for your damn head):

Great insights. I loved reading this article“  (from carpetcleaning shampoo.net …all walks of life we have fans.)
“I’m a huge fan! Appreciate your writing this” (from musicdivasite.com  sing, binyons, sing.)
I must say that by and large I am really pleased with this website. After reading your post I can tell you are educated about your writing. Looking forward to future posts. Cheers!”  (tenlist.com/garage repair openers…a little …british?  Hey Studley-on-Cornmeal  dudes  you guys foolin with us?)

Share

Part Two/Drugi del/Deuxième partie/भाग दो/第二部分

So we begin…the second half (of the beginning) of this thing of ours

Expect significant changes in the layout of this blog in the coming weeks, changes that reflect function as well as form.  Posts will continue to be central to the blog, but we will be creating separate areas dedicated to on-going features, including but not limited to: ‘Case Studies’, activities at Millard Fillmore High, Interviews by and with Progenitors and Downsprings, and other fun activities.

The reason for the change is simply, it is time.

This will be the place to learn about, express, correct and add to the Wakefield Doctrine (aka theory of Clarks, Scotts and Rogers.)
This theory proposes that all people have (from the start of life) three distinct ways of relating to the world.  
It is a given that we are all  born with the qualities (of each form) as potential.  At some point a predominance/predilection for one (of the three) forms expresses itself.  A clark or a scott or a roger is born.  No one is simply a clark or a scott or a roger.  Just mostly.  As a clark, as a scott or as a roger. ( June 25 2009)

(That was from our very first Post.  Not that we are much clearer on what it is we are trying to do with the Doctrine, but we are having more fun trying.)

In the original ‘plan’ for this blog, the Pages were to contain the facts/information/knowledge of the Doctrine.  The Posts, on the other hand, were thought to simply provide a place for Commentary.  However, in the process of writing the Pages and the Posts…

…what’s that?…good question…What is the Objective of this blog?… What do you mean?  Haven’t we addressed this  yet?…we haven’t… shit.
……..I apologise.

Been so intent on writing Posts and trying to come up with different ways to talk about the Wakefield Doctrine, that I have not noticed that, for longer than I realise, I have been  ’talking to strangers’.  Before this blog, the Wakefield Doctrine was simply the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers. (As in: ‘hey don’t get him started about his thing about how there are only three kinds of people in the world named after his friends, you won’t be able to get him to shut up).
The Objective, the goal, the reason and the point of effort is to get as many people as possible to understand and apply the Doctrineto their lives. So, not such an ambitious goal, is it? It comes down to seeing people benefit from knowing the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers.

You do know that this is not really a theory, at least not as commonly defined:
1. A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena; 2. A belief or principle that guides action or assists comprehension or judgment

Hey!, wait a minute now,  maybe I will hang my hat on #2:  ‘a belief…that guides action or assists comprehension’
Yeah, I can live with that definition, a belief that guides comprehension. If you know how a scott is experiencing the world, you will know how they will act in any situation; same is true for clarks and rogers.

 So, back to those changes.  Soon this blog will have 5 sections: (a) Post; (b) Principles of the Doctrine; (c) Examples of the Doctrine; (d) Application of the Wakefield Doctrine; and (e) Fun Stuff.

Not certain about how it will actually look, if anyone has any suggestions about the layout, feel free to leave a Comment.

You know,  this is all about you (the Reader) having the experience of hearing someone (in your life) that you have not mentioned the Wakefield Doctrine to, hearing them say, “jeez he is such a roger” or “that’s not too scottian is it?”
Think about how much fun that will be!  Until then we will keep coming up with new, different and fun ways to present the Wakefield Doctrine, (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers).

You know you’re right! What’s a Post without a contest?  …why a hat (for your damn head) what else would we be giving away?  Lets make that a 3 part contest!*

To win simply let us know:
A) Who (of the three)  you think you will hear an (unprompted) reference to the Doctrine from in your own world? (your clarklike friend, your scottian or rogerian friend);
B) What you would want to read (on a shirt). (Sorry I already have mine in: “I (heart) Janie Sullivan“);
C) Go over to (friend of the Doctrine) Mel’s Spatula in the Wilderness and get him to give you a free t-shirt/shamwow/emergency mop, document that to us and we will give you a hat (for your damn head).

So until the next Post… Hey what’s up with the visiting only on Wed/Thurs?
No!  We are not giving up on Janie and the kids at MillFill High…(I did say there would be a section called Fun Stuff)

And always with the videos….

YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image

* Contest ends sometime Tuesday, limited to the first 10 entrants (as if…)

Share

© 2009-2012 the Wakefield Doctrine All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright